Tuesday 1 December: Eton’s hostility to a teacher’s lecture exposes its own closed mentality

An unofficial place to discuss the Telegraph letters, established when the DT website turned off its comments facility (now reinstated, but not as good as ours),
Intelligent, polite, good-humoured debate is welcome, whether on or off topic. Differing opinions are encouraged, but rudeness or personal attacks on other posters will not be tolerated. Posts which – in the opinion of the moderators – make this a less than cordial environment, are likely to be removed, without prior warning.  Persistent offenders will be banned.

Today’s letters (visible only to DT subscribers) are here:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2020/12/01/lettersetons-hostility-teachers-lecture-exposes-closed-mentality/

456 thoughts on “Tuesday 1 December: Eton’s hostility to a teacher’s lecture exposes its own closed mentality

  1. Lockdown Sceptics: correspondence to Angela Richardson (Con) MP re today’s vote.

    And finally, sent to Angela Richardson (Conservative):

    Thank you for your email in response to mine. I fully expect you to continue following the Government line and so in
    the spirit of the times I am moving you from Tier 1 (a candidate I could not possibly vote for) into Tier 2 (a candidate I shall
    actively campaign against).

    Lockdown Sceptics – Mass Write-In

      1. Better than the PR scheme we have in Norway. You vote for a party, and they buggers decide who your MP is.

  2. It’s time to tolerate free speech at Cambridge. 1 December 2020.

    Cambridge University came up with a policy to defend free speech in March. Staff, students and visitors should have free speech, says the university’s council statement, so long as they are “respectful” of differing opinions and of “the diverse identity of others”.

    This is at best casuistry and at worst blatant hypocrisy! The whole purpose of free speech is to be able to say what you damn well please whether others like it or not. Anything that is “tolerated” “conceded” or “allowed” is not free. Permission to speak or march in protest is the very denial of freedom since it assumes that the PTB have the right to curtail it!

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/01/time-tolerate-free-speech-cambridge/

    1. I see little evidence in Cambridge right now of them being respectful of differing opinions and of the diverse identity of others.

      They have made it abundantly clear that they hate my sort.

        1. Indigenous British, male, middle class, over 60, heterosexual, discarded single father, Christian, thinking and loving.

  3. Good morning, all – another grey miserable looking day. Large full moon still shining, though.

  4. ‘Morning, Peeps.

    The story of Eton’s mess continues:

    SIR – In the Fifties I was form master of a science lower sixth. My timetable included two periods a week when I could freely indulge in educating my pupils – to lead them to consider rationally the great issues they would face in their later careers – rather than follow an exam syllabus.

    Not once in those years did the Head Master inquire what use I was making of those periods. This system was one of the glories of Winchester, where Simon Henderson, the current head master of Eton, was in the Nineties.

    His reported proscription of the lecture, “The Patriarchy Paradox”, recorded by one of his English teachers, has therefore led me to listen to it, and then listen very carefully for a second time. I find nothing in it to which objection can be made.

    It is a well-constructed essay, making numerous references to writers over the centuries. In other words, it is excellent material for sixth-form discussion.

    On Eton’s website, Mr Henderson writes that an aim of the school is “to promote an open-minded and outward-looking mentality so that boys are ready to play an active role serving their wider community”. His dismissal of the English teacher is in direct contradiction, and the educational world is the worse for it.

    Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites
    Fishbourne, West Sussex

    SIR – The woke Left-illiberal axis so loves our venerable institutions – Cambridge, the National Trust, the BBC, the CofE, and now Eton – that it wants them for its modern self.

    Strange … apart from nice buildings, what will they be left with?

    James Walton
    Sutton Courtenay, Oxfordshire

    SIR – If, as the authorities at Eton claim, there exists a law suppressing freedom of speech on particular historical or scientific issues, is it not the moral duty of every freedom-loving citizen to combat it by every means possible?

    Nikolai Tolstoy
    Southmoor, Berkshire

    SIR – Why is it acceptable for headteachers of girls’ schools to lecture them (quite rightly) on the value of girls and women in society, but it is frowned upon for a master in a boys’ school to do the same for boys and men?

    Raith Smith
    Sherborne St John, Hampshire

    SIR – The paradox for Eton’s “woke” Head Master is that, however much he tinkers with diversity and inclusion, and then sacks staff who question his cultural changes, the school remains – as it has done since the reign of its founder Henry VI – a male bastion, allowing parents the choice of a single-sex education (as applies equally at Roedean).

    Until this anomaly is corrected (and it mustn’t be), the Head Master is virtue-signalling, dangerously playing to a gallery that wants to get rid of the school’s 580-year-old traditions, and ultimately of Eton College, too.

    Charles Foster
    Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire

  5. SIR —On a recent visit to a reserve run by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, I found that the bird hides were closed to “keep you safe”. I was there just after first light and nobody was around. To enter a hide and peer into the gloom with binoculars is hardly living on the edge.

    I joined the RSPB because I wanted to protect birds and their habitats. If I wanted help with protecting myself, I would join the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents or the Health and Safety Executive (assuming they offer associate membership).

    Come on, let’s stop treating everybody like children and allow people to manage their own risk.

    Richard Whitticase
    Ramsey St Mary’s, Huntingdonshire

    I joined the Royal Suppliers of Porcelain Blue-tits in 1984 when the organisation was still, ostensibly, concerned about the welfare of birds. I enjoyed travelling the country and visiting its bird reserves.

    Unfortunately it became progressively more and more political and the last straw, for me, was reached when they grubbed out a large copse of prime bird-breeding habitat, at its wonderful North Norfolk reserve at Titchwell Marsh, and installed a picnic area for visitors! Proper birders do not require a picnic area (we carry sandwiches and a flask) but birds need a safe haven where to breed and roost.

    As a direct consequence I cancelled my membership in 1999.

  6. Morning all

    Illiberal hate laws

    SIR – Is Professor Penney Lewis (Letters, November 28) seriously saying that criminals who have raped or murdered should not be ridiculed in cartoons in case this inflames passions against people with similar racial or religious characteristics?

    Having read the Law Commission’s proposals on hate crime, it seems to me it is promoting the idea that people fall into groups, and that some are more in need of protection than others.

    Where does this leave anybody who does not fit into one of these groups? And where does it leave freedom of speech and expression? Will it become a hate crime even to publish reports of rape and murder if the perpetrator has “special characteristics”?

    Where do the events surrounding the Charlie Hebdo crimes fit into this? The proprietors of the magazine would have committed a hate crime by incitement to violence. The murderers who beheaded their staff, and Samuel Paty, must be protected, however.

    Jenny Unsworth

    Congleton, Cheshire

  7. Charles Moore today:

    It’s time to tolerate free speech at Cambridge

    The University’s attempt to codify a policy on free expression creates as many problems as it solves

    CHARLES MOORE
    1 December 2020 • 6:00am

    Cambridge University came up with a policy to defend free speech in March. Staff, students and visitors should have free speech, says the university’s council statement, so long as they are “respectful” of differing opinions and of “the diverse identity of others”.

    It sounds reasonable. One naturally wants people to show respect in their dealings with others. But wait: how can one make people respect opinions which they find appalling? As Stephen Fry points out, such respect is a thing of the heart; it cannot be commanded. Like millions, I think fascism and communism should not be respected, and for the same reason – that they are totalitarian. I cannot respect what I see as doctrines of cruelty.

    What one can reasonably be asked to do, however, is tolerate the expression of such views. Indeed, the very concept of tolerance arises from disapproval. It is the only way to protect freedom of speech when people profoundly disagree.

    Once you try to tie freedom of speech to respect for “the diverse identity of others”, the situation gets worse still. Under recent practice, it takes only one person in an institution to say their identity is offended by some remark for the speaker to be censored and disciplined.

    The current dismissal case at Eton, in which a master put on YouTube his talk to boys on the subject of masculinity, is only the latest example of how such a process can be triggered. The complainant against his words – or so the Head Master thought – had the law on his/her side. Free speech lasted only for so long as no one complained, so it was not free at all.

    Substantial numbers of Cambridge dons are worried by the university’s free speech statement as it stands. They propose amendments which would take out “respect” and insert “tolerance” and have called a ballot of all senior members of the university. The vote closes on December 8.

    The history of the Cambridge statement is telling. In March last year, a visiting fellowship for the conservative social thinker Jordan Peterson was rescinded after a photograph appeared of him standing with a man wearing a T-shirt which said: “I am a proud Islamophobe”.
    The vice-chancellor, Stephen Toope, justified the cancelling of Professor Peterson: “Robust debate can scarcely occur … when some members of the community are made to feel personally attacked, not for their ideas but for their very identity.”

    Thus did Prof Toope, in a manner worthy of a satire by George Orwell, justify the removal of free speech in the name of free speech. Perturbed by this, dons tried to get free speech formally protected – hence the statement. But Prof Toope and his allies were prepared to cooperate only if his concepts of “identity” and “respect” were included.

    Unamended, his council’s statement risks empowering the Thought Police it is supposed to prevent.

    National Distrust
    Once the National Trust decided it would start flagging up its properties’ relationships with slavery and what it calls “colonialism” (as if all agree on the definition of that word), it bought itself controversy without end.

    Part of its process has been to appoint an exterior expert panel under Rita Mclean, a “museums and heritage consultant”. The trust says the group is “made up of professionals from a range of backgrounds including academics and specialists from the museum and heritage sector. Their work is to help steer and inform our internal progress towards high-quality interpretation and contextualisation at properties where colonial histories are particularly relevant.”

    I have asked who is on the panel, but have been told that, “because of possible abuse and threats, we won’t be announcing individual members”. Can you think of a method less likely to inspire confidence than to have experts telling the trust what to do, yet not to tell its members who they are?

    County lines
    The fate of Kent – the whole of it cast into Covid Tier 3 – reawakens old rivalries. For aeons, the county has divided itself at the River Medway. If you come from the west of the Medway, you are a Kentish Man (or Maid); if from the east, a Man (or Maid) of Kent.

    Traditionally, the Men of Kent have rather looked down on the Kentish Men. They claim longer settlement, and stouter resistance to William the Conqueror. The county motto Invicta (“undefeated”) refers to them.

    In recent times, however, the Kentish Men have started to get the upper hand. On the whole, the west is posher nowadays. Property prices are higher, countryside lusher. And now the Kentish Men are inclined to blame the Men of Kent for the county’s unwelcome Tier-3 status. It’s the fault of all those scuzzy bits in the north-east, they say: look at Sheppey with its three prisons; look at those nasty rough people in Sittingbourne.

    Angry Men of Kent fight back from their ancient redoubts such as Canterbury and beautiful landscapes such as the Isle of Oxney. They make unkind remarks about the M25 and Dartford.

    As a Sussex neighbour, I view all this with condescending detachment. But at the back of my mind lies the consciousness that it needs only the stroke of a bureaucratic pen for us, too, to be relegated to the Covid third division, probably provoked by alleged misdemeanours in Brighton or Crawley.

    Talent spotting
    To promote anti-Covid vaccination, the Government is looking for “sensible celebrities”. Isn’t that a contradiction in terms?

    This BTL comment caught my eye:

    Pip Squeak
    1 Dec 2020 7:37AM
    Free speech is sacrosanct. End of. The woke, lefty Eton Headmaster must be sacked and the dismissal of the Master must be reversed. Every British institution has been infiltrated by Marxists and our woke, Conservative Government does nothing. Where is Nigel Farage and his Reform Party? This country desperately needs you.

    The National Trust’s focus on slavery and pro-BLM stance has totally misfired, with members leaving in droves. The eminent historian, Dr David Starkey, without question, must be on the expert panel advising the National Trust, otherwise it will be a whitewash.

    Hear, hear.

  8. Saw something on the news earlier that stated that government assessments have predicted that the lockdowns are going to severely harm the travel, aviation, tourist, retail shopping, hospitality, motor, sport and leisure industries.
    Isn’t that the outcome the climate scientists, Attenborough, Greta and the Greens wanted all along?
    Strange coincidence that.
    But at least the Great Reset is just a tin foil hat conspiracy theory, we can all agree on that.

  9. Low blood pressure? No problem!

    From the DT:

    A Jamaican convicted criminal who successfully fought his deportation after being released from prison has been charged with murder.

    The man was due to be deported in February after serving a six-year jail sentence for possessing a gun, ammunition and drugs. However, it is understood he claimed his deportation was a breach of his rights and he was removed from a flight to Jamaica.

    Within eight months, he was charged with the murder of a young man, attempted murder and the possession of a banned weapon.

    The disclosure came as the Home Office on Monday faced demands from the Labour Party in the Commons and from campaigners to halt a deportation flight to Jamaica on Wednesday of up to 50 foreign criminals released from jail.

    It is likely to inflame the row over “activist lawyers” – lawyers that Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, and Priti Patel, the Home Secretary, claim are thwarting efforts to deport and remove foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers with spurious last-minute appeals.

    Chris Philp, the minister for immigration compliance and the courts, told MPs the 50 Jamaican criminals’ offences include murder, rape, manslaughter, drug dealing, child sexual abuse, grievous bodily harm and firearms possession.

    He said they posed a danger to the public, having spent a total of 228 years in jail plus one with a life sentence, and that their deportation was vital to protect the public, adding: “These are serious offences which have a real and lasting impact on the victims and on communities. This flight is about criminality, not nationality.”

    As Conservative MPs called for “activist lawyers” to be prevented from stopping flights at the last minute, Mr Philp revealed that one murderer jailed for life had already successfully mounted a late legal challenge to avoid deportation on Wednesday.

    It is understood a drug dealer has also appealed against his deportation amid fears within the Home Office that the number to be deported could be substantially reduced by similar last-minute legal challenges.

    Mr Philp said: “We do find that there are last-minute claims made often immediately before removal or deportation, often 24 hours in advance – even though there has been plenty of opportunity previously – apparently with the expressed intention of frustrating the process.

    “There is also opportunity for people to raise repeated claims, in sequence, sometimes over a period of many years, in a manner that would appear to me to be potentially vexatious. That is something I think the Government does need to act to sort out, and we do intend to legislate next year to close precisely these problematic areas.”

    The deportation flight has already drawn criticism from 82 black public figures including model, actress and businesswoman Naomi Campbell, historian David Olusoga and actors Naomie Harris and Thandie Newton, who have written to airlines urging them not to carry the Jamaicans the Home Office wants to deport.

    A similar flight to Jamaica earlier this year to deport 50 criminals including a killer, two rapists and seven violent criminals was halted at the 11th hour following an emergency ruling by the Court of Appeal.

    Holly Lynch, the shadow minister of state for immigration, said the Labour Party had “no faith” that the Government had “done its due diligence” on the people it was seeking to deport to ensure it was justified, lawful and not a further chapter in the Windrush scandal.

    “Of course, we recognise that those who engage in violent and criminal acts must face justice, but we also hear that at least one person on that flight has a Windrush generation grandfather,” she said.

    “Another whose great aunt was on the HMT Windrush, another whose grandfather fought in the Second World War for Britain. It’s clear that we have not yet established just how far the consequences of the Windrush injustice extend.”

    The Windrush scandal began to surface in 2017 after it emerged that hundreds of Commonwealth citizens, many of whom were from the “Windrush generation” – people who arrived in the UK from Caribbean countries between 1948 and 1973 – had been wrongly detained, deported and denied legal rights.

    Mr Philp said each case had been individually checked and “not a single person is eligible for Windrush compensation”.

      1. Kneel Starmer is a millionaire.
        Of course, he earned it through natural talent (like a shark naturally exercises its two rows of teeth).

    1. Chris Philp, the minister for immigration compliance and the courts, told MPs the 50 Jamaican criminals’ offences include murder, rape, manslaughter, drug dealing, child sexual abuse, grievous bodily harm and firearms possession.
      They are being recruited here:-
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAzvU_kuIFc

      1. That reminds me of a funny line in the western film, Waterhole #3, starring James Coburn.
        Coburn has seduced a young teenage girl in a barn and is caught in the act by her father, the sheriff, who angrily points a rifle at Coburn.

        “I’m arresting you for rape!”
        “Rape? This is not rape. She seduced me!
        “She is under 21, that’s statutory rape.”
        “Hold on there a minute, I would not go so far as to call it rape. It’s more like assault with a friendly weapon.”

    2. If Olusoga is against it, it must be good! I don’t care how many Grannies they had on the Windrush – if they have a history of violent crime, they get deported.

      Edit – that’s deport the criminals, not the grannies, although …

    3. The people being deported are convicted criminals.

      What is it about the current Labour Party, human ‘rights’ lawyers and left wing meddlers such as Amnesty International, that they support such criminals but never seem to have anything to say about the victims?

      With people like them around, no wonder the country is on a downward slope!

      1. A Jamaican convicted criminal who successfully fought his deportation after being released from prison has been charged with murder.

        The man was due to be deported in February after serving a six-year jail sentence for possessing a gun, ammunition and drugs. However, it is understood he claimed his deportation was a breach of his rights and he was removed from a flight to Jamaica.

        If he is found guilty again, then deport everyone who was involved in getting him off the flight, or perhaps kill a member of their family so that they can feel the justice that the family of his victim felt.

  10. IMO Iran will wait for Biden. SST. 1 December 2020.

    A journo friend called yesterday to ask my opinion about the course of near term events regarding Iran.

    The murder of a senior Iranian scientist at the weekend may have been done by Israel or the United States or both in cooperation. He may or may not have been the “father” of an actual Iranian MILITARY nuclear program as opposed to a CIVILIAN electric power focused program.

    In the 2007 NIE on Iran the USIC would not commit publicly to the existence of such a military program and they never have since. The theory of the case then was that Khamenei ordered an end to an experimental military program after the occupation of Iraq by the US and the destruction of the Iraqi government. Khamenei published a fatwa stating that such a program was an evil thing and was no longer needed as a deterrent against Iraq.

    The subsequent US/Israeli focus on a putative Iranian nuclear weapons program was IMO an artifact of the Israeli/Cheney/Ziocon fascination with their 1% theory of strategy. Stated simply, this is the concept that if anything can possibly threaten you, even at a 1% level of probability, then you should seek to crush it.

    On that basis the Israelis have long wanted Iran crushed. They have lacked the means to do it themselves unless they want to use the nuclear weapons they pretend not to have. They evidently do not want to do that and so their long yearned for solution is that the stupid but strong Americans do it for them with perhaps a minor supporting role for themselves just so that they can claim afterward that they did all the hard bits.
    In that context the death of the Iranian savant is easy to see as a provocation intended to bring on an Iranian attack which could be used to goad Trump into a grand finale effort against Iran.

    The USS Nimitz Battle Group is in the area with all its wondrous planes and missile shooting ships. The US has been moving JDAM shooting B-52s into the region for a week. Things like the B-2 bomber and B-1B are on call from far away. Someone has been setting the stage for …? Who knows? I doubt that it is Trump. He has shown himself to be long on talk, and short on actual shooting.

    Are the Iranians dumb enough to take the bait? I doubt it. All they have to do is wait for Joe, Blinken et al to take over and they are likely to get something very like JCPOA. Pat Lang.

    In light of the fact that a drone strike earlier today killed another Iranian official Colonel Lang’s analysis that Israel is trying to precipitate a war in the last days of Trump’s presidency seems to be correct. The outcome of wars by their very nature is always doubtful and the West’s record in the Middle East is dismal even by this standard. Should it occur it would almost certainly plunge the world into an even worse condition that it is now and destroy the Biden presidency before it even gets off the ground!

    https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2020/11/imo-iran-will-wait-for-biden.html

    1. And the best BTL at the moment is “This did make me laugh out loud. The least funny thing is that it is all true

    2. And the best BTL at the moment is “This did make me laugh out loud. The least funny thing is that it is all true

  11. Arcadia has gone into administration and has left a £350million pension deficit for its employees.

    What’s the problem? Its robber-baron owner, Cur Phil Slime-Green, is a billionaire, courtesy of paying his staff starvation wages for decades. Simply sequestrate his ill-gotten fortune to fund that pension deficit. How difficult can that be?

    1. Laffer rules dictate that his yacht does not make port in Britain until the threat to confiscate it has been removed.

    2. His fortune in in his wife’s name, I believe. But I’d like to see him returned to the gutter where he belongs.

      1. So is the Duke of Sussex’s. I expect she’ll spit him out as soon as she gets the right lawyer.

      2. If his fortune is in his wife’s name then she is complicit in his usury. Clap them both in irons and redistribute their “wealth”.

        Robin Hood never had a problem with that.

      3. Morning harry, his wife certainly got the £1.3 billion dividend a few years back – she should cough up for the pension fund

    3. ‘Morning, Grizz.

      The Management, who answers to ‘Mrs HJ’ has just commented that absolutely no one has a good word to say about Slime-Greed. I have had to gently explain to her that it’s because he is one of life’s outstanding shitbags. I can see that this is yet another failure to add to my charge-sheet, which was started some 43 years ago. Where did I go wrong?

  12. 325040+ up ticks,
    Morning Each,
    That bloody far right racist is at it again, fancy giving an alledged paedophile a bloody nose when he should really have waited for an act to take place as in rotherham
    ( 16 year ongoing).
    Prototype re-set justice in the making.

    https://youtu.be/8EcQNIQypKM

    1. I am not sure I feel a kindred spirit with this Irish bovver boy, even if I do agree with him about Islamists.

      I have myself had “paedophile” suggestions made against me quite without foundation (as an easy means for a woman to discard an unwanted husband and father in favour of someone more adequate). The “paedophile” slur (along with “racism”, “misogyny”, “homophobia”, “antisemitism” and so on) has been used as an easy way to get round Habeas Corpus and let loose the sort of thuggery I have no time for, regardless of the identity of whoever is doing it.

      1. 327040+ up ticks,
        Jm,
        You make him seem guilty of coming from an Irish line.
        The peoples should IMO have trust in their courts & policing system but that trust is rapidly fading.

        1. Actually I was playing on the old stereotype of Irishmen loving a good scrap, and is cultural rather than implying guilt. That sort of fighting spirit dates back to Caractacus and Boedicca, before the ancient Britons were chased out of the big island by the ordered Saxons and mannered Normans with their Viking heritage.

          One of my favourite choral pieces is ‘Phaudrig Crohoore’ by Charles William Stanford, which is about a big lad who thumps the bridegroom and runs off with the bride at a drunken Irish wedding. It can only be sung in an Irish brogue.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS2hgT6Vfv0

      2. I have no particular affection for Tommy Robinson but I am impressed by his determination to stand up for his beliefs. As I said yesterday:

        The treatment Tommy Robinson has received from the police, the courts, the media and the politicians is a disgrace which makes me feel ashamed to be British.

    1. Maybe, George, because it’s so cold up North, it freezes the lips whilst hardening the heart.

        1. None of us gets to this age without a few life-changing experiences. Bereavement, betrayal, cancer, divorce…….to name but a few. we deal with it as best we can.

      1. That’s why my brother moved down there and bought a house outside Truro. To get proper counselling over a decent pint or four.

  13. From the Telegraph –

    “Ethnic minorities to be prioritised for rapid Covid testing after lockdown”

    Looks like the BLACK Lives Matter lot, have some say in political circles ?

    1. let them have the vaccination first.
      Unless the vaccination is for something they haven’t released yet

  14. Just wondering if all this testing is so they can examine our DNA and determine what people that want to live and what people they want to perish so as to select the appropriate vaccination.

    1. The testing is a sham. The PCR test is so sensitive as to require laboratory conditions and highly trained laboratory technicians. The way it has been organised with Dido Harding as its front is as shambolic as her reign at Talk Talk.

      Untrained persons employed by Serco bossing people around in tents placed in car parks is proof that the testing regime is a con. There will be cross contamination of test swabs in handling and transportation. In addition the laboratories set up to process the tests will not have the necessary protocols or trained staff to function effectively.

      The Portuguese courts recently pronounced the PCR test to be unreliable in a case brought by Germans who had been unnecessarily quarantined when one of their group tested ‘positive’.

      Leading clinical immunologists have pointed out the propensity of PCR as applied by this government to be worthless and giving almost 100% false positives.

      1. Did you read yesterday’s article by Dr Michael Yeadon, published in Lockdown Sceptics? He knows what he writes about.

        1. No but Dr Yeadon was into this issue months ago. I will take a look.

          One of the problems we know is that when politicians with no scientific background take charge they are always led by those who shout the loudest. In this instance the Covid response appears to have been based not on scientific questioning and evaluation of the threat but on the presumption that the virus will only be ‘defeated’ by a vaccination programme.

          Having bought Bill Gates’ vaccines the government are now pressing ahead on the basis that the vaccines will be effective despite no evidence on a large sample over the normal duration of five years. Worse still the vaccines will be visited on the rest of the world, a truly frightening prospect.

          I would add only that any drug company given indemnity from prosecution by government should things go awry will not be too careful about what they are selling.

  15. A watery sun has appeared. About time, and all.

    G & P have discovered a very comfortable chair in one of the bedrooms….

      1. These cats are trained. They don’t do that. It is a hard slog getting them to conform – but it works. I have had five cats in my time, and all were taught to behave properly.

        1. Wait till they climb up things when they are full-grown and heavy. Especially trouser legs and bare legs.

          1. I don’t want to seem smug (or smugger than usual) but in all my cat years, I have never had that problem.

    1. Lovely sunny day here at “the Old Mid Herts”. As El Tel (Wogan) use to call it. I might see if i can get as far as walking across the gold course with doggo today. Middle son and his wife in a bit of a state she works for Top Shop,…… he works as a director of a public services/facilities management company both jobs under threat. No sunshine for them………..Hard Times.

      1. Good to see you back here, Eddy.
        I hope the administrators can find buyers for some of the Arcadia businesses.

      1. ‘Afternoon, J, I have heard that if you take your time ticking the ‘captcha’ box, the system decides that you’re NOT a robot, otherwise you would have immediately ticked the box.

        I have taken my time for several weeks now and haven’t once had to identify bridges, hills, taxis etc.

    1. Still better than Vuukle, which autocensors – ar least on Order-order (Guido Fawkes) which removed Disqus and now doesn’t have access to old posts, rather like the Daily Telegraph’s in-house system. Essentially it encourages trolling, as long as you don’t use certain verboten words and phrases, as well as string more than a couple of sentences together. Twitter-lite?

        1. Luckily the ad-block stuff seems to have gone by the wayside, so mine still works fine. The autocensor of Vuukle is a right pain, especially as many posts regularly get ‘moderated’ – which is codespeak for ‘never looked at but deleted’. Order-Order is now going rather ‘mainstream’ in raguing over petty things – politicking – and not getting to the crux of discussing the problems and solutions.

          The political Right are very good at moaning, less so at discussing HOW to solve problems and volunteering to stick their heads above the proverbial parapet and actively do something. They value their personal lives and income from their day jobs too much to risk anything to better society.

          1. This is because the solutions are simple and do not require discussion.

            A better society comes *from* not interfereing with the lives of others and looking after yourself.

            The more individual liberty people have, the more agency and the less control exercised over them the less has to be done.

    2. I notice that the Captcha pictures are American based e.g. crosswalks, fire hydrants etc. I think we need a British version: “Tick all boxes with a Hoodie/Kebab shop/stabbing etc.

      1. understand where you’re coming from. I’ve just spent 3 hours being bounced between Microsoft Office and Windows senior technicians [read village idiots] and can assure you, if British images replaced the septic ones, based on the exchanges I’ve had this PM, they’ll think the world’s flat and Kim Yong UN’s their President. They are as thick as mince although a good captcha image is the heli leaving the US Embassy in Saigon. Now where’s that fire hydrant?

  16. Britain’s Libyan Islamist problem. Spiked.1 December 2020.

    The core essence of state-supported multiculturalism – promoting cultural difference over social cohesion and prioritising minority rights over collective responsibilities – has not served Britain well. To support its efforts to create a more socially trusting and democratically stable society, the UK government needs a security-oriented immigration and asylum framework which better prioritises collective British safety.

    The threat posed by British Libyan Islamists shows how much work there is to be done.

    Morning everyone. Not something that you are going to be seeing in the MSM soon methinks. Worth reading for the detailed breakdown of the UK centres of jihadism alone.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/12/01/britains-libyan-islamist-problem/

    1. A bit like putting up the ‘Closed’ sign outside the china shop to deter customers after letting in a herd of bulls to do what bulls do.

      1. 327040+ up ticks,
        Afternoon S,
        They have a thicker umbrella that deflects the arrows of truth & decency.

    1. Is Mr Batten suggesting that non Muslims should be encouraged to rape white girls? Is the state going to encourage that by having the police not arrest such criminals, as they did with the Muslim rapist paedophiles?

      All sarcasm aside, until the issue of Muslim paedophilia is publicly acknowledged and openly discussed and stopped, permanently the state sends a message that this behaviour is acceptable.

      1. 327040+ up ticks,
        Afternoon W,
        I believe the JAY report revealed what was going on in no uncertain manner, did NOT alter the voting pattern one iota.

  17. 327040+ up ticks,
    The USA computerised voting apparatus issue has, via US
    judge Timothy Batten on reflection said, they are to be held intact for future evidence of alledged wrong doing.

    A cross ocean Batten types framework to hold patriotic democracy together would greatly benefit both Nations.

      1. 30 million died in The Great Leap Forward:1958 – 1962.
        Some sources claim as high as 55 million.

        By Chinese standards a minor dose of seasonal flu (oops).

  18. SIR – Several years ago I did the same as Procter Hutchinson (Letters, November 28) and established with an in-line meter the daily electricity demand of all the appliances in our house. This knowledge had virtually no effect on our behaviour but provided reassurance that we didn’t have any very wasteful appliances.

    The real purpose of smart meters is to enable utilities companies to vary prices according to the time of day and peaks and troughs of demand. I won’t have one until I see positive reports from Telegraph readers.

    David Dunbar
    Broadway, Gloucestershire

    I would say that there are no wasteful appliances, only wasteful users…

  19. SIR – The most appalling part of electric-vehicle production (Letters, November 29) is the mining of cobalt, much of which happens in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

    Owners of these cars might be interested to know that most of the cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is carried out by children aged between 10 and 15. It is estimated that at least 10,000 children work in the mines – not bad for a country where underage mining is supposed to be illegal.

    Many of these children earn less than £5 per week – all to make Western car owners feel virtuous for not using fossil fuels.

    John Hamilton
    Rhyl, Denbighshire

    Very well said, John Hamilton! Just another aspect to consider in this ruinous plan.

    SIR – Stephen Clough (Letters, November 20) asks if electric cars will be modifiable to allow for wheelchair access. I can assure him that the wheelchair-accessible vehicles industry in the UK is a world leader in setting standards, with both the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders and the Department for Transport aware of the importance of providing mobility for disabled wheelchair-users.

    In 2013 our company developed, tested and type-approved a Nissan wheelchair-accessible electric vehicle, which is marketed throughout the UK and Europe.

    Rod Brotherwood
    Brotherwood Automobility Ltd
    Sherborne, Dorset

    A British success story – and you can’t often say that. I visited Brotherwood on business a couple of times about 12 years ago, and their innovation was impressive. They deserve a positive mention on the Letters page.

    1. When school pupils are obliged to study Black History for GCSE let us hope they will be asked to examine the role of the black slave traders who continued to sell their own people into slavery long after Wilberforce had stamped out the trade in Britain.

      I hope they will also examine the slave trade still practised by black people in the Republic of Congo where black child slave labour is being used to mine cobalt for the batteries used to power electric cars.

    2. On the other hand these children in the cobalt mines are helping their families to eat.
      We make a mistake if we think that people in the Stone Age can be lifted into the First World in a single generation. It took us 50 generations.
      Comparing family income in London with family income in Kinshasa is not helpful. Context is everything.

    1. Well, there is some sanity in the world. I’m qquite surprised actually. This is the sort of woke nonsense the hard Left would be trying to force in through law.

      1. Lui Asquith, from trans children’s charity Mermaids, said the ruling was a “devastating blow” and “a potential catastrophe for trans young people across the country”.
        The charity said: “We believe very strongly that every young person has the right to make their own decisions about their body and that should not differ because somebody is trans.”

        The trust said in a statement: “Our first duty is to our patients, particularly those currently receiving hormone blocking treatment, and we are working with our partners, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, to provide support for patients concerned about the impact on their care.”

        Its spokesman also confirmed the trust would seek permission to appeal against the judgment.

        They will certainly try again

        1. We believe very strongly that every young person has the right to make their own decisions about their body…”
          No, they don’t. That’s because children are not old enough to make life-changing decisions. Parents have that responsibility.

          1. Their position rests on the assumption that there is an innate condition of “being born in the wrong body”. They talk of “brain zones” as a fixed position so given the opportunity, I asked an Oxford professor of Experimental Psychology a simple question. “Is the human brain hard wired”? She gave a simple answer. “No”.

    1. If i could do those I would say – Look a Meteor

      – Never mind that what about a no deal Brexit?

  20. Nowhere is the EU’s hostile intransigence clearer than in its absurd demands for our fish

    Britain is not alone in having experienced Brussels’s irrational attitude to fishing rights

    ALEXANDRA PHILLIPS

    Alittle known line in Monsieur Barnier’s CV details his tenure as the French government’s minister for the ecological transition. It sounds as gratuitous as the many working groups in the European Parliament that produce more hot air than the carbon emissions they purport to tackle. Yet it means he has had to handle the hectoring of French fishermen, known for their mercurial propensity to fight for the right to fish, whatever and whenever, or turn their fleet into navires de guerre, particularly in the Channel. If there’s one thing the French do with aplomb it’s to coordinate a grève.

    So it is hardly a surprise that the negotiator should do the bidding of his compatriot Macron, scarred by the Gilets Jaunes, facing fractious unrest in Paris over policing rules and pandemic policy and looming elections next year. When it comes to poisson, one country will dig its heels in, exposing the farce of a project where policy is determined on a catch-all basis.

    The London-centric media is filled with dismissive incredulity at the perceived blockage in negotiations coming down to fish, which they like to remind us represents only 0.12 per cent of GDP, never having sported a sou’wester nor bothered to set foot in the likes of Grimsby to see first-hand the social deprivation that the destruction of an island nation’s fishing industry has wrought on coastal communities.

    The sneering is typically focused on the UK, rather than what this percentage of catch laughably represents to a political bloc of 500 million citizens where four landlocked member states receive millions in fishing subsidies. To us, the debate orbits around the future of entire coastal communities and the optimism of what sovereignty over 630 miles of coastline could entail. To Brussels, it is sheer profligacy and mercantilism.

    Under the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy, UK fishermen are limited to just over a third of the total catch from their own waters. The fact that the British fleet’s net profit is still the EU’s highest and second only to Spain in terms of tonnage serves to demonstrate the potential profitability in retaking our seas. The UK fleet has declined by about 30 per cent over the past two decades, while the EU takes six times more fish from our waters as we do from theirs. Meanwhile independent Iceland and Norway land well over three quarters of catch from their own seas. The £580 million price tag on the fish the EU is eyeing up is dwarfed by the £900 million a day we are currently throwing at our pandemic response, but British fish processing is actually a £4.2 billion pound industry. Multiply that if our catch were to triple, and suddenly a boom business emerges.

    The UK wants to reassert a 200-mile economic exclusion zone around its coastline, as is the norm under the UN’s Law of the Sea, and has already managed to negotiate reciprocal access with non-EU Norway, exposing Brussels’s position as an aberration in international protocol.

    Yet when it comes to fish, the EU is rarely one to back down. One need only look at multiple Economic Partnership Agreements and conditions of aid with the world’s poorest countries to realise that Brussels’s appetite for ocean fare is grotesque gluttony. The indiscriminate trawling of seas around the Horn of Africa has directly contributed to the rise of piracy while just last year, the EU happily broke international law and jeopardised a UN peace process to hammer out a fishing deal with Morocco in the disputed territory of Western Sahara.

    The opening gambit of Barnier’s negotiating team that the bloc would accept a cut of 15 to 18 per cent in its share of catch in British waters is risible and far from the 80 per cent UK control tabled by Lord Frost, in line with our Scandinavian neighbours. [Only 80%?!]

    The Conservatives are doubtless aware, too, that 186 coastal constituencies make a Brexit-backing ring around the country, while the aptly named Nicola Sturgeon would be forced to explain to Scottish fishermen, whose North East fleet accounts for half of the UK industry, why she would want to hand newly gained fishing rights back to Brussels.

    But perhaps above all is the startling symbolism of sovereign sacrifice in casting aside national dominion over our seas. British fishermen, I am sure, would be more than happy to see North Sea cod land on continental plates. But it is surely their prerogative to sell it.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/30/nowhere-eus-hostile-intransigence-clearer-absurd-demands-fish/

    1. I keep asking what fishing rights, state support and ‘level playing fields’ have to do with an FTA, and never get an answer.

      1. It’s all part of the EU’s plan to punish us for our effrontery in voting to be free of their yoke.

  21. 327040+ up ticks,
    This looks highly like a counterfeit vaccine passport where did you get it, asked with raised truncheon ?
    Reply,
    from a masked man.

    Another form of Blackmail deployed by the overseers.

    breitbart,

    UK Minister: You Might Be Banned from Venues Without Vaccine Passport

  22. Using celebs to advertise vaccines is a sign of a desperate governing class

    Rumours that the Government may outsource public health messaging to celebrity influencers shows little regard for ordinary people

    BENEDICT SPENCE

    If there were someone out there with serious cultural and social heft, celebrated for their feats and known to all and sundry (some sort of “celebrity” if you will), who, if push came to shove, you feel you’d trust completely if they told you to do something important, who would it be?

    David Attenborough is, apparently, the most trusted of such people in the UK, according to some 2018 poll or other, which also ranked assorted members of the Royal Family pretty highly (one suspects a few may have taken a dip since then). A report by GQ earlier this year of the most influential celebrities, meanwhile, ranked the BBC’s Emily Maitlis as queen bee, whilst Carole Cadwalladr came in 13th. One may wish to take this study with a pinch, if not a mine, of salt.

    Personally, if Jurgen Klopp turned round to me with that brazen teutonic smile and told me “Yo, Ben, is willy weeely important for you to give me und ze boys your credit card details,” I probably wouldn’t dismiss the request outright. But then, I can’t ever imagine a situation so dire, and my need of convincing so great, that Kloppo, Michael Sheen or Vicky from Geordie Shore might be requisitioned by the state to chivvy me along.

    Fears abound over the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories when it comes to the rollout of an immunisation programme for the coronavirus disease. Whilst the vaccine, when it comes, will not be mandatory, what is plain to see is that the authorities simply don’t trust the public to do the sensible thing. This is nothing new – only today the local government in Wales announced that pubs would not be allowed to serve alcohol, and Downing Street issued guidance on whether or not Father Christmas’s across the country would have to wear masks or be allowed to balance children on their knees.

    If government holds the public in such low regard, is it any wonder that it feels the need to employ famous people to tell them to take a vaccine to stop a disease that has killed thousands, wiped billions of the economy, and brought their lives, and the country, to a halt?

    It ought to be obvious the value of the vaccine; you and your loved ones get to not only live longer, but people can get their lives back. Thousands of other people, from cancer patients to the unemployed, will have crushing, life-threatening pressure alleviated. It shouldn’t be too tricky to make the facts available, in plain language, about the usual queries – lack of proper testing (not true), side effects (minimal, and certainly preferable to choking to death on your own lungs) and effectiveness (whoever decided to report the Oxford vaccine as just 70 percent effective has a lot to explain).

    If people are sufficiently resistant to such evidence, celebrities are hardly likely to persuade them otherwise; they will, justly, ask ‘what do these people know?’ And for the slightly less obstinate, it is another reminder of how little our government thinks of us; that we might well fall into the moron category, and are sufficiently suggestible that someone who is famous could bend us to their will.

    [I’m not sure if Spence is a supporter of the vaccine or is simply satirising as though in the position of the government.]

    But on top of this, reaching out to celebrities for help is an unmistakable sign of a desperate governing class. Far from, as it is meant to do, convince people that their talent is being endorsed by the rich and famous, it says that their influence has waned so much that they need to rely on fame built on something other than political competence or achievement: See Ed Miliband and Russell Brand, Tony Blair and David Beckham, or the Tory party and Boris Johnson. [Many a true word etc…] So we are faced with the reality that we are not only governed by people who believe us to be simple, but who are tacitly admitting they’re hardly rolling in competence themselves.

    Sadly, our culture increasingly reflects this. Celebrities are no longer cultural figures who have succeeded; celebrity itself is the culture. “Influencer” is now a viable career choice – fuelled by social media, celebrity for the sake of celebrity. The Prime Minister and the Chancellor are essentially influencers now, as is the outgoing President of the United States. If that is the state of play, is it any surprise that we now outsource public health messaging to more successful influencers?

    If you have serious concerns over the safety of coronavirus vaccines – so serious that you would be prepared to risk catching covid-19 itself to avoid them – a BBC face is not likely to sway you. And, if your fears are already outweighed by the nightmare we have lived through since March to the extent that you are counting down the days until the vaccine arrives, you don’t need a reminder from central government that they consider you a child completely pliable to celebrity smiles and overtures.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/30/using-celebs-advertise-vaccines-sign-desperate-governing-class/

    1. Surely the simplest way is to work it into the storylines of Corrie, East Enders and the Archers, and the take-up would be at least 80%?

    2. On the subject of celebrity endorsement, I just posted this on TCW:

      I remember the fuss over the MMR vaccine and Tony Blair’s youngest son, who was an infant at the time. The public demanded to know if he had been given the vaccine on the flimsy assumption that if it’s good enough for the Blairs, then it’s good enough for us.

      At that time, it was very rare for the PM of the day to have a small child, so I had to ask myself: how do these parents usually make decisions about any medical treatment for their children in the absence of prime ministerial endorsement?

      The subject was being discussed by a panel on Radio Five Live. Shockingly, one female panelist said it was important for the public to know; “What if Kathryn [Blair] wants to go on the pill?”

      Is this what it’s come down to? Discussing the future contraceptive needs of an identified adolescent so publicly? What is wrong with these people that they need celebrity endorsements to help them make grown-up decisions?

      Opposition leader William Hague, when asked for his views, replied, quite rightly, that it was a “…a matter for Mr and Mrs Blair.”

          1. Ho, ho! About 15 years ago, in France, we visited an English couple. The MR had taught with the wife many years before. The bloke said to me, “You used to be famous once.” Summed it up perfectly. Now most of the “fans” are in their dotage or dead. No one under 40 knows who Jimmy Young was! Let alone the L Beagle…!

          2. I didn’t know who he was either. I thought the programme was called the Jay Wise Show.

  23. Not So Good Moaning.
    Decisions, decisions.
    Do I start the day by giving my printer a good slap? Or do I firstly inflict serious GBH on my froth filled washing machine?
    Sod it: I’ll have another coffee while I ponder on my priorities.

    1. Well, clearly, a full risk assessment (FRA) on both courses of action is a pre-requisite before you can do anything, and coffee will probably assist you in this task (although, obviously, some caution is required to ensure that said coffee is at the optimum temperature before attempting to drink it in order to avoid the inherent scald risk in the activity).

      Once the FRAs have been completed, and assuming they reveal a similar level of risk inherent in each activity, then an executive decision to determine relative priorities is required. This is an outcomes-based activity, and is determined largely by your own priorities. Is a sheet of printed paper more important to you than a clean sheet?

      Once those priorities have been determined we can move on to the main activity of the exercise – determining how either (or both) activities comply with current (ie today’s) Covid Compliance Regulations (CCR’s). You will find further guidance on compliance with CCRs in the next section…

      1. …and do not forget to run a FMEA (Failure Mode Effect Analysis, or, as I always remember it – F***ing Mucking Everyone About) in order to select the least worst outcome.

        1. I used to read a lot of that stuff as I rose to senior positions in the company. It culminated in voluntary early retirement.

  24. That’s in front of the lean to/car port cleared of a mixture of soggy leaves, sodden sawdust from the chainsaw and road muck and, because the mixture, all 2 to 2½cwt of it, looks as if it will produce decent compost, taken up the garden and dumped in a 1 ton builders bag together with some rather fat worms I discovered whilst shoveling it up.

    As the sun dipped below the valley tops over 1½h ago, that’s me for the day! The temperature is already dropping fast!

    1. Fear not, Robert – only three weeks and the days begin – oh so slowly – to lengthen.

      1. Well after being -1½°C when I, rather belatedly, got out of bed, it struggled to reach the tropical realms of 1½° and has already slumped well below 1°.

        It has, however, been a beautiful clear and almost windless day up here.

  25. Good morning. A cold but bright & dry morning up here so far.
    -1½°C on the yard thermometer.

    No comments allowed on the Celia Walden article I see:-

    I hope the courts make the right decision on puberty blockers
    How did we ever get to the stage where teenage girls are being given hormones to help them transition from female to male?

    CELIA WALDEN
    30 November 2020 • 7:00pm

    The landmark judgment due in the case of Keira Bell vs the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust should come down to the meaning of two words: “Informed consent”.

    Did 23-year-old Bell “agree to the health intervention”, made by the NHS’s Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), when they prescribed puberty blockers to aid her transition to a male “based on an understanding of the benefits and risks involved”?

    To answer that question, you need only know one fact: at the time of her “consent”, Bell was 16.

    Six years after this gender non-conforming child thought she had found the answer after years of “hatred for my female body” and “low self-esteem”, Bell’s problems are far from over. And although the clinic has insisted that all their patients undergo a thorough assessment process, which was ongoing, Bell claims it took only three one-hour appointments for the self-described “tomboy” to be given puberty blockers; these delay the development of the signs of puberty such as breasts, periods or facial hair. Cross-sex hormones were administered next and, at 20, Bell had a double mastectomy.

    Today, Bell has been left with “no breasts, a deep voice, body hair, a beard, affected sexual function and who knows what else that has not been discovered”. She will have to live with the fact that, if she is able to have children in the future, she will not be able to breastfeed them. And all because of “a brash decision” she told the court she made as a teenager “trying to find confidence and happiness”.

    Again, GIDS have defended their approach, maintaining they work closely with children and their families to reach the right decisions for them, with fewer than half of those seen going on to take puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones, and that comprehensive information is provided to all throughout the process. Only the issue isn’t that the Tavistock didn’t explain the risks – the possible bone density loss, compromised fertility, poorer cognitive function and reduced height, alongside the enduring psychological and emotional implications – but that a child is not able to understand those risks.

    The absorption and processing of information, after all, comes not from a list of words reeled off a disclaimer or indeed from the cautionary advice put forward by adults, but from the life experience that Bell didn’t have – a life experience no 16-year-old can possibly possess.

    “I feel I could say anything to my 16-year-old self and I might not necessarily listen at that time,” Bell has explained. “And that’s the point of this case: when you are that young you don’t really want to listen.” In other words, a child cannot give informed consent.

    Fenella Morris QC, representing the trust, said in a written submission that young people were made fully aware of the impact of hormone blockers prior to treatment and were “given all the necessary and appropriate information – and very considerable support to assist them in their thought processes”.

    So how did we get here? How did we get to a place where children as young as three are being encouraged to question their gender and – back in 2018 – a third of the children referred to the NHS’s only gender clinic for children since 2011 were revealed to be autistic? How can it be that, in the US, activists have been trying to ban Abigail Shrier’s new book, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, simply because the Wall Street Journal writer is questioning why there has been a sudden surge in those presenting themselves as trans, and raising concerns about the mental health of teenage girls? Indeed, it’s considered “brave” of her publisher, Swift, to be going ahead with its UK publication next month.

    The answer is fear. Too scared to question the knee-jerk reactions of a health system bent on intervention and terrified of being branded “transphobic”, we have let down children like Bell and the autistic 16-year-old daughter of another woman, “Mrs A” – who has joined her in her High Court challenge this week – with our silence.

    Focussing on “detransitioners” – those who wish they hadn’t had gender reassignment surgery – when trans people are still struggling for rightful acceptance and often face stigma, anger, disbelief and trolling online is problematic in itself. And yet Bell is not alone in her experience.

    Over the past five years, an increasing number of women and men have shared similar stories only to be met by the same stigma, anger, disbelief and trolling; and if the High Court rules in Bell’s favour, it seems likely that more will come forward. Their experiences are as valid and important as the experiences of many who have found gender reassignment not just a deliverance but life-saving, and have never regretted their decision.

    Which is why, if I were Bell’s lawyers, I would make this my closing statement. Take the word “trans” – with all the emotion and controversy attached to it – out of the equation for a moment. Set aside your ethical, political and religious beliefs and simply ask yourself this: when the Ministry of Health recommends that both body piercing studios and tattoo parlours should get parental consent before working on anyone under the age of 18 and when it is illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to gamble, buy cigarettes, alcohol, fireworks or pornography, should any child be encouraged and enabled to make a life-changing decision before reaching adulthood?

    1. I can remember, as a young teenager, disliking the changes taking place in my body, and wishing I was a boy. That phase didn’t last long, and then I wished for a better, more feminine body than I had. I ended up with what I got.

      I also remember one of my sons playing with dolls as a little boy. These phases are all part of growing up.

      I hope the courts make a wise decision in this case – Bell clearly regrets that she was persuaded to take this treatment and was too young to realise the implications. It should be illegal to pander to these passing phases, or for parents to encourage any child to “transition”. They are what they are and no amount of surgery or hormone treatment will change a person’s genetic make-up.

      Adults like David/Diana Thomas can make up their own minds. Though I quite enjoy her/his articles in the DT magazine, I still think she’s deluded.

    2. The issue I have with this post is that one is not a “child” one second before its 18th birthday, and immediately an “adult” with all the rights, responsibilities and presumptions one second later. I refuse to consider a minor over the age of puberty a “child”, but rather a young person transitioning from one state to the other. This process in humans takes years, not seconds, and varies greatly from one to another.

      I was bullied at school because my voice didn’t break until I was nearly 16. The teachers used to call me “pathetic little runt” in front of my classmates. “Conceited little darling” was another, and “Fairy Morfey can dance out” another. They loved it that I didn’t conform to the norm.

      I have to say that while majority is at 18, one can drive at 17, get married and start a family at 16, and be convicted of a criminal offence at 10. Teenagers must develop their own independence, and often pride themselves in being more capable of making life-changing decisions than they are. But they are not children; they must have the freedom to make mistakes and to learn from them. A guardian’s role is primarily to make sure these mistakes do no serious or lasting harm. It seems that those with a duty of care over her were so wrapped up in their own doctrine that they neglected their primary responsibility.

      It may well be that, at 16, she was simply conforming to what her peers were expecting of her, and what modern social studies graduates in the teaching profession expect of “tomboys”, since gender is a social construct these days, rather than a biological one. Teachers can get the sack for suggesting otherwise.

      1. It’s very sad isn’t it that some people have been so caught up with these kind of agendas where they are willing to encourage young people to have such life changing procedures. I suppose it could be called a first world problem. It’s awful. I’m absolutely sure that the idea of changing gender is foisted on any children below the age of puberty, especially a three year old. Dreadful.

        1. A form of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. “(MSBP) is a mental health problem in which a caregiver makes up or causes an illness or injury in a person under his or her care, such as a child, an elderly adult, or a person who has a disability. Because vulnerable people are the victims, MSBP is a form of child abuse or elder abuse.” I suspect though, in these cases, it would never be allowed to be seen as such.

          Good morning, vw.

          1. MSBP – I’ve made this observation myself. I note that the fathers of these children are rarely available for comment.

          2. Good morning Pmum. It’s definitely abuse. Unfortunately our laws are not very consistent when it comes to age, as Jeremy says above. However as yet there is no law against stupidity and encouraging any child to go through gender Re-assignment comes under medical experimentation in my view. And really that’s a lot of what medicine is about. I know that is how “progress” is made in that field but this poor girl even had a double mastectomy at the age of 20. Was she still unaware of the implications? It’s something we will never know. So she is able to have children but maybe looks and sounds like a man. God help her.

  26. In today’s paper –

    “Primary care leaders have indicated that some surgeries may refuse to sign up to the Covid Vaccination programme unless health chiefs promise more money and to pay the extra costs of delivering the jabs up front.”
    “Now – where did I read about a Hippoocratic Oath or something ?”

          1. And there was this late comer wondering what Diane Abbott had to do with the vaccination program.

    1. Good moaning all.

      I thought I read GPs were to be paid £12.58 for each vaccine delivered? They are already treated differently to others tax wise – they work mainly for the NHS and yet are supposedly self employed. It just shows their greed.

      1. Yes – that’s the figure I read, as well. Though they won’t be doing quite so many if the untrained volunteers will be doing quite a few of them.

          1. But the practice nurses are paid by the GP. I’ve no complaints on that score – the nurses at our surgery are very skilled and experienced.

          2. I agree. They are the most skilled. Wouldn’t be happy with a little prick from a doctor. {:-))

        1. Doctors themselves wouldn’t be doing the jabs, the nurses/health care assistants et al will be. Plus anybody else the government can think of willing to jab someone in the arm.

    2. That’s the least of our worries – I’d be far more concerned with the following:

      1. That the pharmacutical companies asked and got the government to agree to indemnifying them for the conseuqnces of ANY side effects of the various vaccines that will be used.

      If their products were safe, don’t you think the companies OWN professional indemnity insurance would cover it? It doesn’t because they are releasing their products YEARS before the normal, more rigorous testing would have been completed.

      2. That whiolst ministers are saying that the vaccine won’t be manditory, they already are heavily pressurising companies from the travel, hospitality and entertainment sectors to effectively make having the vaccine a condition for most aspects of life other than buying food and other essentials.

      No vaccine, no travel, holidays, going to sporting or cultural events, eating at a restaurant or drinking in the pub (whatever Gove may say). But its not manditory – they just privatised that function, as Quantas already has shown.

      Ye name’s not down, ye not comin’ in. Or as someone here suggested to me yesterday, maybe those of us who decline the vaccine (at least for a good few years) will be given yellow stars to wear whilst out in public.

      —-

      In addition, has anyone in the MSM questioned the authorities about the reliability of the PCR tests or why the firms pushing for greater lockdowns (often via their internal or external mouthpieces via the MSM or social media) like, IMHO Amazon, facebook, Microsoft and Google are the very firms making the most proifts from the pandemic and squashing the majority of tehir competition (permanently) in the process, gaining vast amounts of power and wealth in the process.

  27. Just back from three miles on the bike. Nice sunny afternoon, though chillier than of late. But the sun makes ALL the difference, doesn’t it?

    Great excitement in Goatland. One had got out of the pen with the electric fence – but, instead of making off for liberty – was standing the wrong side, bleating piteously!

    BTW, this morning, the local branch of The Arts Society (an organisation which I highly recommend, especially if you live alone) had an online coffee morning – with an excellent talk by one of the members comparing and contrasting Vermeer’s “The Little Street” with Pieter de Hooch’s “Courtyard of a House in Delft”.
    Fascinating. Although I have known those painting for many, many years – and seen them in their respective galleries – there is always something new to learn.

  28. Typical Johnny Foreigner:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/01/naked-mep-leapt-window-belgian-police-broke-orgy-breaking-coronavirus/

    “Naked MEP leapt from window as Belgian police raid orgy for breaking coronavirus rules

    EU diplomats were also arrested at the ‘gang bang’ held just metres from a city centre police station, it was reported

    1 December 2020 • 2:11pm

    Brussels police patrol the streets to enforce the coronavirus curfew

    Brussels police patrol the streets to enforce the coronavirus curfew Credit: AFP

    A naked MEP tried to escape through a window after police broke up a 25-strong sex party in Brussels’ city centre for breaking coronavirus rules.

    The unnamed MEP reportedly injured himself jumping out of the first floor of a flat above a bar, where the orgy was being held.

    He was promptly arrested by police but brandished his European Parliament badge and claimed immunity. EU rules don’t confer immunity when a MEP is caught in the act of committing an offence.

    Belgian media reported police sources as claiming there were also a number of EU diplomats at the sex party, which was on Friday night and just a few metres from a city centre police station and the city’s iconic Grand Place.

    “We interrupted a gang bang!” one source told local media and confirmed the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Mayor of Brussels were called.

    Police fined the 25 people, who were mostly men, at the orgy £225 pounds each before releasing them. They broke rules limiting gatherings of people to four.

    Belgium only allows single people two “cuddle contacts” under its coronavirus rules and insists on masks being worn when social distancing is impossible.

    Brussels is under strict lockdown, including a 10pm curfew and a ban on the sale of alcohol after 8pm. Drink and drugs were found, it was reported but not confirmed.

    “I can confirm that about twenty people were fined for failure to comply with health measures following an evening party organised on Friday evening on the first floor of a building in the centre of Brussels,” the Brussels’ prosecutors office said.

    The news sparked feverish speculation in Brussels, the home of the major EU institutions, as to the MEP’s identity. At time of publication, that had still not been confirmed.

    A European Parliament source said: “There is nothing wrong to participate on a sex party of any kind. However, such kind of meetings with many people are illegal under the coronavirus laws.

    “The fact of being covered by parliamentary immunity does not exempt to obey the law.”

    “Parliament doesn’t investigate private life of people. Again, if there was misconduct it is up to the relevant authorities to act,” the European Parliament’s chief spokesman said as he ruled out an inquiry.”

    1. Was he escaping because he was embarrassed to be caught flouting these absurd covid rules or because he was behaving like a complete degenerate?

  29. I have been worried for some time that Johnson’s cock up with Covid would mess up Brexit. Indeed I suggested that he should have delegated Covid 19 to somebody else so that he could concentrate on Brexit.

    I hope I am wrong but I very much fear that if Boris is defeated in the current vote he will resign or be deposed immediately and that Brexit will be completely betrayed. The revolt could very well be a manipulation staged by the many Remainers still in the Conservative Party finally to destroy their detested Brexit.

    Why on earth did Johnson not deselect all the Remainer MPs in the Conservative Party before the election and make a pact with the Brexit Party? Perhaps he was never committed to Brexit in the first place.

    1. 327040+ up ticks,
      Morning R,
      Because he is of the same ilk, and the brexit group a top up for the in name only,
      name rustling tory lookalike party.

      In point of fact the brexit group investors paid £25 as a threat if johnson does a wrong un, an in doing so stood down to allow him an 80 carte blanche ticket to ride.

      The major broke the treachery cover revealing their true agenda, followed by
      the wretch cameron / clegg / may the treacherous, the nine month delay confirmed their true intentions.

      To believe there is a Tory party in parliament is to also believe in unicorns & dragons.

      The future heading for the current lab/lib/con coalition can be clearly seen on reading the parliamentary canteen menu.

    2. Even if he could de-selected all the remoaner Tory MPs – which he can’t – all that would’ve happened is that they would’ve formed a voting bloc outside the party as they did before the General Election, with no whip to enforce their loyalty.

      As in the US with many states’ Republican Parties, the UK’s local Tory constituency parties are often very loyal to their MPs, whatever they do when in office.

      Rarely do they de-select, and many don’t have the cojones to go through with it when the time is right – i.e. in the final weeks in the run-up to the deadline to submit names of prosepctive candidates for a General Election, giving the sitting MP little to no opportunity to do any mischief in parliament. My MP is one of the ‘Grieve 12’ and yet the constituency party has stood firmly behind him, despite the area having a majority for Brexit as well.

      Too many politicians are attracted to power first and doing right by the public a distant second or third place (likely behind enriching themselves). Very few actual ‘honourable members’ in parliament, and even fewer with the brains and common sense to come up with decent solutions to the country’s problems.

      1. A good constituency MP is one that works for the good of all his/her constituents of either party or none. That means that he works for what it often the majority of his/her constituents rather than just those who are members of his local party association. Local party active members include plenty who are realists and pragmatists; they recognise that an MP who had earned enough support to be elected cannot simply be an echo chamber for their partisan views. Constituency parties want to select someone who stands a chance of being elected/re-elected as an MP and will, sensibly, be reluctant to deselect one who does not give them the support that they would like on a partisan issue but enjoys support on a wide range of other issues. Constituency parties want MPs, not unsuccessful candidates.

    3. Johnson’s commitment to Brexit in 2016 was decided almost on the toss of a coin when he decided which way to jump.

      Not for Britain but for Boris Johnson.

    4. I think your last sentence sums up the situation. I am sure he saw an opportunity and seized it without any firm conviction.

  30. Two killed by car in pedestrian zone in German town, driver arrested. 1 December 2020.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2020/12/01/TELEMMGLPICT000245743025_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bq7cN0L8Ura0Bdvarobt0WjyHzqgYxKd6UVlZtV38aGgo.jpeg?imwidth=1240

    Mayor Wolfram Leibe told the SWR broadcaster that in addition to the two dead, 15 people had suffered serious injuries.

    “We have an amok driver in the city. We have two dead that we are certain of and up to 15 injured, some of them with the most severe injuries,” he told SWR.

    Well it’s a pedestrian area so his foot didn’t slip off the brake. I shall forebear making any obvious guesses!

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/01/several-injured-car-pedestrian-zone-german-town/

        1. cf Berlin Christmas Market 2016.

          Edited having found right year. Never thought it was four years ago….

        2. cf Berlin Christmas Market 2016.

          Edited having found right year. Never thought it was four years ago….

    1. Well now, not for the first time, a market in “culturally enriched” Germany has been targeted in the run-up to Christmas – one of the two most important Christian religious festivals of the year. Muslim terrorists use the occasion to attack and murder innocent people as they go about their pre-Christmas shopping. It demonstrates the contempt these savages have for Christianity. They know that crowds will form and folk are generally more relaxed and off their guard.

      Maybe some reciprocation is long overdue, “Eid” would be a good time. Where’s Brenton Tarrant when you need him?

      1. Britain with an established church is constitutionally Christian.

        That being the case should not Christians receive more preferential treatment under the law than those of other religions?

        If not, why not?

        1. Because (a) they always turn the other cheek; (b) the “leadership” has no interest in Christianity or Christians.

        2. I think that believers in all religions (or none) should receive equal treatment under the law, provided they do no harm to their fellow-citizens. However, Islam’s not a true religion, it’s a nihilistic death-cult pursuing political and social world-domination.

          The very existence of Islam is a threat to civilisation everywhere and we must fight it – “a degüello”. We have no choice, after all they were the ones who declared a “Holy War” so let’s give them one.

          “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”
          — Arnaud Amalric

          1. Right enough, Phil, thanks to the fifth-column of traitors and the Muslims that have infiltrated every part of our governing system. It won’t be easy to rid ourselves of these barbarians – it may be already too late – but nonetheless we must fight.

            If we’re at the point where civilisation falls, let’s go out with a bang – not a whimper.

    2. It appears that the arrested man is 51 years old and a German national (which could of course mean almost anything).

      Slightly outside the usual age for Norwegian Methodists taking driving lessons.

      1. What they are afraid to say is he is a naturalised migrant. Wait til they bomb the Tiergarten.

        1. Of course it was the car’s fault, given the likely driver was from the self-styled ‘religion of peace’!

  31. DTStory

    Pablo Matera stripped of Argentina captaincy over racist tweets

    The Argentina’s rugby captain made his ‘offensive’ remarks nine years ago.!

    How selective we are with our indignation!

    We can forgive today’s black slave traders for the slave trade they are still practising in the Congo’s cobalt mines – but we cannot forgive the British for the slave trade they stamped out 200 years ago though we can forgive the black slavers who continued the process

    1. Being a Lefty is very complicated and requires significant amounts of doublethink and simply lying to yourself while pretending some things fundamental to your ideology do not exist.

    1. I saw a young man collecting two children from the junior/infants school today when I went shopping. All three (presumably from the same family) were wearing masks in the street, including the youngsters. Why? They were in the open air and children of that age are not at risk at all.

    1. Knock knock
      “Who’s there?”
      “The undertaker, bring out your dead and have a very merry Christmas”

      1. No – it’s the Police asking why granny isn’t sitting by an open window freezing to death (to save her from catching COVID [but apparently not pneumonia]) and why your family is otherwise having a jolly time.
        Bah-humbug!

    1. It’s the biggest store in Gloucester and was previously known as the Bon Marche. I wonder what will be done with the building.

      There will be nothing left in town centres and high streets by the time the Great Reset is done.

    2. At least they had one still there to close. My parents’ local store had already closed in the first tranche of closures before COVID.

    3. It’s the biggest store in Gloucester and was previously known as the Bon Marche. I wonder what will be done with the building.

      There will be nothing left in town centres and high streets by the time the Great Reset is done.

      1. Indeed, but that was the Great Reset’s aim. What’s far worse is how most people and seemingly all bar the politicians on the payroll of such organisations are completely blind to all this. You’d think by the number of dystopian films and TV shows over the years showing this sort of thing that people (other than those planning it) would’ve took some notice. Apparently not.

      2. 327040+ up ticks,
        Evening N,
        When the great reset is complete via the lab/lib/con coalition party the town centres will have no need of high streets.

        The town centre main attraction will be the compulsory attendance RRC.

        RRC = reset retraining centre.

      3. Wellingborough had neither Debenhams nor M&S but nearby we’ve lost Debenhams in Bedford and M&S in Bedford, Northampton and Kettering, although the latter has set up at Rushden Lakes.

        There are M&S foodhalls in WB and Bedford.

        Edit:
        Lost before the panic…

        1. Hmm, Flowton, in deepest Suffolk, has no shop, pub, school, village hall or bus service but we, as a tight-knit community based on our 12th century, Grade 1 listed church, are standing up to a man and woman against the idea that 242 acres of viable, agricultural farmland may be overrun by acres of Solar panels, providing a mere 49.9Mw to the grid yet denying us of the possibility to produce, when we currently import 39% of our food.yet only supply 42% of the electricity demand, nationwide.

          I may well repeat this tomorrow and thereafter until we can have this ludicrous idea over-turned.

          If you can help, please check

          https://www.facebook.com/caresuffolk/photos/a.109291404315035/140370647873777/

          Every little means a helluva lot.

          1. The other nasty sting in the tail is that once they’ve got the solar panels (with a limited life) and they are past their usefulness, the land is then considered “brownfield” and can be built on.

  32. Time for me to go. A glass is called for. Six more pictures hung. No drilling; no swearing; no blood – all thanks to DinK’s very helpful suggestion of sticky hangers.

    Should be with you tomorrow – when I have a mirror to hang….on the wall on the other side of the bath. Should be fun. Drilling WILL be required.

    Enjoy your evening. (For those interested in a bitta culcher – https://www.connected.theartssociety.org/talks-lectures ) Free.

    A demain

    1. “sticky hangers”: Sounds ideal for slippery politicians.

      Do you have a plentiful supply, Bill ?

    2. Not being unduly pessimistic, but I hope you have walls that never change temperature and the house never changes humidity and that your pictures are not very heavy.

      1. This in Engerland – not France! And the indoor temperature remains pretty constant around 20ºC throughout the year.

        We have only “stuck” light pictures.

        1. Very sensible.
          One tends to presume that Thomas paintings will have heavy gilt frames and be 4ft by 6 ft minimum.

  33. Tonight’s headlines about the vaccine.

    The WHO is concerned that there is fake news about the safety of the new vaccines.

    Damned right there is.

    They’re telling us they’re safe.

  34. LAST POST

    Phew – the Trier killer was just an unhappy, white (“very strange”) electrician. NTDWI. What a relief for the bereaved.

    1. Strange indeed. The police report, which names the perpetrator as Bernd W, states that he habitually used to drink in a kebab shop. Halal booze??

      Make of that what you will.

  35. Britain’s two-tier police state. Spiked 1 December 2020.

    The truth is, I started the day wanting to create a positive story about the protest and the police. I attempted to talk to several police officers, but understandably they were either too busy or didn’t want to speak to a journalist. My default position is always that we should assume the best of people and be in open dialogue. I am sure the police have a difficult job to do. I finished the day feeling shocked by the police strategies I had seen and nervous to walk past individual police officers.

    What makes all this worse is that the style of policing contrasted so heavily with how the Black Lives Matter and Extinction Rebellion protests were policed. Police took the knee for BLM and sometimes didn’t even bother to do anything about XR’s stunts. Anti-lockdown protests, on the other hand, provoke excessive force. There seems to be a strategy of making lots of arrests to create a politicised media story. We have two-tier policing in London.

    This is a personal experience of the activities of the UK’s Stasi at last weekend’s demonstration and worth reading for that alone. These people are just Politicised Thugs now, well worthy of the Police State that the UK has become!

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/12/01/britains-two-tier-police-state/

    1. Buy the store for £1.
      Give your husband a £1.3 billion dividend.

      Declare bankruptcy, get a Damehood and retire to your luxury yacht.

  36. From Penarth Times https://www.penarthtimes.co.uk/news/18907022.ex-penarth-pupil-isis-terrorist-begs-return-uk/
    AN Islamic State fighter and former Penarth student has told of his six years as a recruiter for the terrorist group after being tracked down by journalists.
    Aseel Muthana, a former St Cyres school pupil, left Butetown, where he lived with his brother and parents, to join IS in 2014 – and now he wants to return.
    Aseel, now 24, told the Sunday Mirror of crucifixions, beheadings, and bragged that he “missed” seeing homosexuals being thrown from rooftops.
    He secretly travelled to Syria at the age of 17, telling his parents he was going to a friend’s house for maths revision.
    Aseel has been on the United Nations sanction list since 2015, after he and brother Nasser appeared in IS propaganda videos. Nasser is believed to have been killed by an air strike in 2016.
    Aseel bragged on social media he was “100 per cent pro” the brutality used by ISIS.
    Speaking to the Mirror, he expressed regret that he never saw the rooftop ritual inflicted on homosexuals.
    Nasser headed to Syria around the start of 2013. He spoke to Aseel on Skype and the younger brother, then 17, saved £300 and flew out at the end of the year.

    Regret, eh? I’ll give him regret – a 9mm in the back of the neck is what he deserves. Be happy to oblige.

    1. What an idiot for resigning. He should have claimed it was a ‘fact finding’ mission.

          1. Sorry but I once worked for a gay millionaire. His butler, fed up with dealing with the laundry work after the housemaid scarpered and ran off with his gardener, and it was he who complained about the condition of the sheets after a weekend bash.

            The butler was head hunted by Conrad Black and hopefully made his escape.

      1. Quite so. He should have explained he was merely conducting an in-depth probe into the darkest recesses of sex, as practised in the EU.

    2. Howdy, Cochrane.
      How did it go with your over-chillied curry? WAs it better the next day?

      1. Hi OB, I only had the last of it today, so it lasted 3 days! It was excellent every day, but not sure it got any milder.

    3. Funny how the narrative has changed.

      It was initially reported to be a gang-bang, lots of men and a few women.

      Now the MEP has been unmasked (as it were) the focus is on it being a gay gathering rather than a straightforward whore mongering.

      Either way it’s sordid and I hope he’s hounded out of office.

      1. If that got out and was condemned they would have to do the others and people would realise the entire EU is a putrid, abusive, depraved waste of money.

    1. Our two opened Second Son’s christmas present – they liked the rustling of the wrapping paper, so ripped it all off and scattered it all over the living room.
      Sigh…

    2. I was going to suggest you get plenty of boxes for the new family members……my two used to have their boxes to hide in and pounce on t’other one when passing innocently by…great amusement!! Enjoy your evening.

    3. You can make a whole assault course for the kitties with empty boxes. Cut the exits as flaps. Leave some packaging inside so they have to squeeze through.

    1. It must be a mighty deep swamp.

      Justice department, department of homeland security, FBI, republican judges, Republican state governors, secretaries of state and thousands of election workers all involved in cheating Trump.

      1. Attorney General Bill Barr has just announced no evidence of fraud that would affect the outcome of the election.

          1. The thing I find extraordinary is that senior Democrats and a few posters on this site continue to deny the obvious. I assume that the latter are so dyed in the wool with adoration of Obama, who is running the show, that the electoral fraud has escaped their notice.

            I have a number of friends in America and they are all horrified and indignant at the election racket. My next door neighbour who works for a Christian charity out of Fort Worth/Dallas is dumbstruck by the supposed election of Biden, my own friend of 50 years who was born in Fort Worth but now is an executive for Coca Cola in Houston says the same.

            My ancestral relatives who are descendants of Sam Houston all vote Republican and despise the Democrats. Our ancestor Sam Houston was one of the original pioneers in Texas.

            Without benefit of this knowledge (not that it would make any impact on their prejudices) I have been attacked by persons named appropriately ‘Jack and Jill’ whose actual connections with America remain opaque.

            New England was founded by folk sailing from Ipswich which included relatives of Samuel Pepys. Pepys’ relative, an uncle, hailed from our village and others are interred in the graveyard of Stoke by Clare.

          2. To achieve the level of fraud being claimed by the likes of American Thinker would have needed many thousands to be implicit in the fraud. None turned round and spilt the beans?

            Barr a bought politician? I agree he has been bought like most/all of them but he has been behind Trump all of the way.

          3. Many have ”turned around and spilled the beans” but as you only read the MSM, you’re not fully informed.

          4. Corim, there is simply no evidence of the type of fraud needed to steal the election. The Attorney General, appointed by Trump last year has stated this. I too have relatives and friends in the US, they do not share your relatives’ views. I too come from a part of the country with historic links to the USA and my family name was amongst the earliest settlers. But that’s irrelevant. Biden won, it really is that simple.

          5. That isn’t true.

            You haven’t viewed the evidence presented at Gettysburg and you have ignored the statistical evidence which Proves there was massive electoral fraud.

            It is impossible for Biden to have won this election.

          6. Bought and paid for in most or all cases.

            You have to look at the evidence yourself which of course you haven’t done and don’t want to do because you know it’s conclusive.

          7. Chucking around allegations of bribery without a shred of evidence does you no credit Polly.

          8. It’s not allegations. Many judges, officials and politicians in the US are bought and paid for. Most are Dems, some are Reps, Romney is one.

          9. “…the statistical evidence…”, really? Two candidates with a credible chance of winning. One won in 2016, the other representing the party that lost in 2016, but which received more votes. Biden flipped some, but not all of the states Trump flipped in 2016, some of these states were very marginal in both elections.

          10. Come on. That is not studying the statistical evidence or Gettysberg. There’s a stack out there. Go and find it and stop garbaging !

          11. Once again there is a very small minority that disagrees with you but daren’t come out of the wood-work and say so.

          12. I disagree with him (corimmobile). The choice for Americans was much like it was in the last Presidential elections – a choice between two of the most detested people in the country. Trump lost because Biden gained more electoral college and, indeed, popular votes than him. There’s always a winner and loser in an election and the loser’s best course of action is to accept this with dignity and his character unharmed. You say that there’s a very small minority that disagrees with corimmobile but I would bet that the vast majority of the people of this country, including many Trump supporters, would say that the US election was fair and honest.

          13. Once again, Enri, I’m afraid that I have to disagree with you. If you cannot concede that the US elections were riddled with fraud, then you, like JenniferSP will have to await the outcome of the US Supreme Court’s decision.

            Given the magnitude of the Trump vote in 2016, I think it’s a bit harsh to label him ‘Most Detested’. Check your bias, old chap.

          14. I am content to wait for, and accept, the Supreme Court decision – will you? I have checked what you call my bias but since my comment applied equally well to the two candidates, I can’t see that it showed bias. I suggest that it is you who has bias. That, on its own, is OK unless it blinds you to reality. The reality is that, so far, not one shred of irrefutable evidence has been produced to support your view that the election was fraudulent. Evidence might be forthcoming and, in which case, the Supreme Court will consider it. Almost every day that passes shows yet another influential supporter of Trump withdraw their support on the issue of the election or another state or governmental official reject the allegation of electoral fraud. That is also the reality.

          15. I too, have many American friends who are appalled at the level of OUTRIGHT FRAUD that is manifest in this election. I’m just waiting for Trump, his cohorts and the Supreme Court to rule on this before December 18th.

            I do so want to see Biden and his so-called Democrats get such a smack in the mouth.

            I despise them. Downvote now JSP!

          16. Funny thing is, Jennifer, I won’t see it as I need to refresh in order for it to appear. Here it is 22:45 and I’m going to bed very soon with Best Beloved – a person I doubt you have and loneliness is a very bad situation without strength of character. Good night all.

          17. I assume that the latter are so dyed in the wool with adoration of Obama, who is running the show

            I don’t think Obama is running anything. He never ran anything before he was president, so I doubt he is now. He’s a non-entity in a suit, a figurehead.

          18. Just to clarify, our actual connections to America, is the fact that we have lived here, first in Maryland and then West Virginia, for the past 40 years. Therefore, we DO know something about this at first hand!

          19. Trump won with a landslide. It is obvious to us ignoramuses across the pond. I suggest it is even more obvious to the rotten social media channels and press in the USA too whose political bias is blatant.

            To clarify: as an ‘ignorant’ observer I think the real issue is not one of ‘voter’ fraud but one of ‘electoral’ fraud. It is for the people of the USA to sort this matter out. We have equally or worse problems in the UK with our own disingenuous political class.

          20. I see that that silly woman cannot admit the slightest possibility that Mr Biden’s cohorts may have tweaked a vote or two.

            Carry on in your delusion and be surprised when it all comes on top.

        1. Barr has not investigated anything. As far as can be seen Barr has merely made pronouncements. He is a boughten politician preferring a maintenance of the status quo. Trump will rightly sack him.

        2. Yep, but we live in a ‘post-truth world’ where accusations can be made without any actual evidence, but by virtue of spreading on social media, the accusations are accepted by a frighteningly significant number of people. It’s dangerous because it opens the way for no election result ever, to be accepted by the losers.

          1. I accept a part of your logic. However there are so many conflicts and anomalies in the 2020 election results as to render your blind faith in the result factually incredible.

            The loser is Biden, a decrepit and utterly corrupt has been. His drug addled and equally corrupt son is already exposed as such and the harm these Obama stooge agents have already enacted to the American people is in fathoms buried in the depths of its depravity.

    2. 327040+ up ticks,
      Evening C,
      Gets deeper every General Election in the UK, no serious attempt at change via the polling booth.

  37. The brave new world of post-Brexit farming has been hijacked by the bureaucratic green blob

    The new system of subsidy for agriculture seems to repeat the bureaucratic errors of the EU’s schemes

    JAMIE BLACKETT

    The Government’s preliminary announcement on future farm subsidies fills me with gloom. After the EU referendum, I had hoped that the UK would accomplish the radical New Zealand-style transformation of British agriculture needed to give farmers the opportunity to earn a fair wage in the global market place, and to do so by actually producing food. But Defra Secretary George Eustice’s template for English farm support – and farmers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should expect something similar – looks depressingly like EU-lite.

    Payments to farmers to maintain the environment are to be replaced with, er, different payments to farmers to maintain the environment, but with subsidies to be phased out in full by 2028. Don’t let Defra kid you that they are offering anything more than a slight change of emphasis, with a greater focus on producing “public goods”. For the last 20 years, I have been receiving payments for hedges, ponds, rushy pasture, water margins, wild flower meadows and winter stubbles. I have committed to various “schemes” because I view wildlife conservation on my farm as just as important as the food we produce.

    But the payments have never been quite enough to compensate for the loss of the income I would have received if I had farmed more intensively, and certainly not enough to compensate for the form filling and the stress of the battles I have had with the civil servants over the interpretation of ever-changing rules. The final straw came when I was made to keep a diary like a primary school child.

    The underlying thesis of the Government’s approach to farming is now the same as the EU’s: the patronising notion that farmers should be paid just enough to stay in business in order to curate the countryside within carefully prescribed and frequently illogical guidelines, while food leaves the farm gate at or below the cost of production helping to boost the profits of quasi-monopolistic food processors and supermarkets. The result also looks like being the same: consumers growing obese on the illusion of cheap food, corporate interests in the rest of the food chain growing bloated on the profits, farm incomes continuing to fall in real terms and – because something has to give – the whole farmed environment suffering despite the token bits that will attract subsidy.

    I use the word depressingly advisedly. There is a mental health crisis in British agriculture. One farmer commits suicide each week. Farming charities cite cash-flow difficulties and red tape as the primary triggers. This is not going to be helped by less cash for more tape, even if the tape is green not red.

    Those of us who have farmed through previous subsidy cycles know what is coming next, despite Mr Eustice’s pledge to reduce regulation. Farmers will need to jump through certain hoops in order to qualify for support. A hoops roadshow will take to the highways to consult “stakeholders” about the design of the hoop and the hoop compliance regime that will require legions of civil servants to inspect the hoops and fine the farmers for not jumping high enough.

    Process will again take priority over outcomes. The hapless farmer will find that, as just one of many stakeholders, he will be accorded parity at best with the noisy demands of green quangos and charities. The taxpayer will be ripped off because the administrative cost will dwarf the sums that eventually filter down to farmers in subsidies. Meanwhile, the “progressive” social engineering implicit in the “small farms good, big farms bad” approach to the tapering of future subsidies sounds good politically but will in reality just mean that medium sized farms like mine will have to farm more for profit and less for nature.

    The Brexit vision, articulated during the referendum campaign, appears to have been hijacked by the green blob. The radical thinking by Tim Lang, about restructuring our food system from plate back to field, quietly shelved by the civil servants. Talk of de-regulation and fair competition seems just to have been talk.

    Jamie Blackett is a farmer and the author of ‘Red Rag to a Bull, Rural Life in an Urban Age’ (Quiller)

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/30/farmer-want-farm-not-curate-countryside/

    BTL:
    Joy Bowes 1 Dec 2020 1:32PM

    An excellent article. Thank you Mr Blackett for pointing out that environmental payments do not make up for the income lost when farmers go in for environmental schemes. There may well be a grant for planting trees but there is no ongoing support to make up for the fact that the land on which they are planted has been taken out of production.

    It is not widely known that current environmental schemes, and the proposed replacement, are on the basis of “income forgone plus costs”, not the outcome in terms of the benefit to ‘natural capital’. What this means is that having agreed the scheme, the farmer takes the land out of production, carries out the necessary work at his or her own expense, then waits to be reimbursed by the Rural Payments Agency. The RPA does not have a good track record of making payments on time or in the correct amount.

    Where I diverge from Mr Blackett is that I think there will be dire consequences for small farms, particularly in upland areas of England, because the Basic Payment scheme (i.e. the old EU payments) are being phased out from next year but the much-vaunted Environmental Land Management scheme doesn’t come in until 2024. Many upland livestock farms operate on very tight margins and currently depend on the BPS to keep going, so may fail in the years when there is a funding gap. The Foundation for Common Land estimates 14,000 farms in England at risk of being loss-making or earning less than half the minimum wage by 2024. If tenanted farms go to the wall, the land may not be offered to new entrants, but could well be taken back in hand by landowners who see an opportunity to embark on schemes such as ‘rewilding’ for which they will receive ELMS payments.

    J Blackett 1 Dec 2020 3:12PM

    @Joy Bowes
    Thank you, we don’t really diverge. I was merely pointing out that scaling back per acre payments for larger farms is incoherent as it will probably do the most environmental damage. I completely agree that small upland farms are in mortal danger. The govt appears to have forgotten the Brexit plan for ag, written by Owen Paterson at the time of the referendum, which envisaged Swiss style subsidies to upland farms for landscape/habitat/socio-economic reasons. I fear that many of them will end up being sold for forestry.

    1. “Therefore if any man can shew any just cause, why they may not lawfully be joined together, let him now speak, or else hereafter for ever hold his peace.”

    2. A brother of my Gt grandfather was a bigamist.
      He married his wife’s second cousin and got away with it. He had 10 children with his wife and three more with the illegal one. I recenly met two ladies who are his gt grandchildren – my 3rd cousins.

      1. A bigamist.
        Men were made of sturdy stuff in those days.
        I tell my wife that she can absolutely believe in my fidelity because I would never be crazy enough to take on another one.

    1. Good evening, Maggiebelle

      No report on this on the BBC News tonight – I wonder why?

      But there was a report on how very severe taxes on imports and exports could be after a No-Deal Brexit. All just hypothesis.

  38. DTStory: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/artists/racist-rants-anti-lockdown-songs-has-eric-clapton-escaped-cancellation/

    “From racist rants to anti-lockdown songs, how has Eric Clapton escaped cancellation?”

    When he was under the influence of drugs and alcohol he said some pretty nasty things.

    However, he has expressed his shame and remorse and has tried to ‘move on’ and has shown no signs of any racist recidivism for over forty years.

    Likewise the British ‘repented’ for slavery and indeed it was the British who led the war against the international slave traffic 200 years ago.

    So why are the wokery and BLM so cruelly unforgiving? The Christian message is very much focused on the forgiveness of sins for all those who truly repent – why is this so vehemently rejected?

    1. I’ve read that BLM was founded by two women who are very much against Christianity and indulge in rituals intended to summon forth the spirits of their ancestors. Christian tradition, though of course not the woke church of today, regards this as summoning demons, though the people involved presumably consider it benign?

      http://adventmessenger.org/video-black-lives-matter-leaders-and-founders-are-summoning-the-dead-promoting-ancestor-worship-and-laughing-with-the-departed-spirits/

  39. 327040+ up ticks,
    Listen up all English ovis important instructions from the
    Capo dei capi & squeez at number 10,

    My government & I & pillow whisperer will grant lowering the bar at xmas to make it a tad easier for the older ovis to jump
    5 days only then it will go back up, a good bit higher.

    Now there’s a thing,

    Coronavirus: Fewer Than Two Per Cent of NHS Hospital Trusts Busier Now Than in 2019

    1. Indeed – ‘saving’ the NHS by ruining everything else. Well, almost everything, sans the civil service, Amazon, the social media and tech giants, ‘green’ firms and big pharma.

      1. A car passed me today when I was out walking the dog. It had 68 plates with an EU logo and prominent in the back window was a “Ban Fracking” sign. The thought crossed my mind that it’s one thing being an idiot, but it’s quite another to advertise it to all and sundry.

  40. Evening, all. It seems to me that Eton is trying so hard to overcome its “elitist” past (what’s wrong with elitism, I ask – you wouldn’t pick the first squad from a telephone directory, would you?) that it has gone overboard for wokeness. In the meantime, here’s a touch of Schadenfreude Welsh style:

    https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/local-hubs/mid-wales/2020/12/01/youre-barred-first-minister-not-allowed-in-100-welsh-pubs-ahead-of-alcohol-ban/

    Made oi larf it did.

    Then there are the shocking stats about the damage done by the Covid panic idiocy:

    https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/uk-news/2020/12/01/job-losses-major-cuts-since-the-start-of-the-pandemic/

    Heads should roll, but of course they won’t; it will be promotion and/or golden handshakes all round. B’stards!

    1. I believe the economic damage so great and the flaws in the Johnson government’s approach so blatant that both Johnson and Hancock and his cabinet will be toast in the New Year.

      There must be hundreds of disaffected Tories in the party at large and pressure will be put on Brady and the 1922 Committee to be rid of Johnson and his stooges at the soonest.

      1. I’d like to think so, corim, but “my party right or wrong” seems to be deeply engrained. How’s Sinbad, still KBOing? My pooch celebrated his 17th birthday today – treats, cuddles and a walk were the order of the day.

        1. We must have faith in right above wrong.

          Sinbad is on a different seizure medicine but has to take a lesser dose of the stronger stuff which was causing his lack of appetite. He is gradually improving but obviously not the same dog as before his seizures.

          He is taking some raw fillet beef offcuts and his chewy sticks. He has developed a taste for Twiglets.

          If Sinbad leaves his food our 20 year old cat Paris finishes it off so there is a balance of nature of sorts.

          Again on the plus side he barks at knocks on the door and similarly greets the tradesmen we have in the house at present, helping us smarten the place up for sale to a London stockbroker or some such. We will probably move to Norfolk eventually, preferably near the coast.

          The house is an authentic large thatched ‘chocolate box’ cottage in a quiet village with a beautiful garden. It is commutable from here to London, I did so for years.

          1. That sounds very positive, corim. Good luck with the house move if/when it happens. We have the builders in at the moment, re-pointing the house. Not that we’ll be moving (I’ve said that I’ll be carried out of this one in a box!), but some of the joints have no mortar left at all.

          2. With us it is all of the things we started and failed to finish. I commuted from here to London for ten years and then from here to Norwich for two years and then back to commuting to London for a further two years.

            I can imagine how relieved some might be now that it is proven that people can work from home and travel in to London or wherever as required. Houses in my area of North Essex on the Suffolk border are in high demand from stockbrokers wanting a bolt hole from which they can escape Mayor Khan’s nightmare from time to time.

          3. You couldn’t do much better than move to Norfolk but, be aware, you shall have to live there for at least 40 years before you’re accepted as a local.

            A quick lesson – a question that may be asked, ” Ha yer father gotta dicka, bor? To which the answer (well known to Dumplings), is, “Yeah, he want a fule to cum and roide it, will ye cum?”

            Translation, “Has your father got a donkey, boy?”
            “Yes, he wants a fool to come and ride it – will you come?”

      1. Wow, I’m glad I read down to your post before I posted almost exactly the same except my brain said, “Two falls, a submission or a knockout.”, but you’re correct. How the brain keeps things lurking in the depths of your mind.

          1. The White Hart in the article is about 2 miles away, all uphill. A nice pub, with an absolutely amazing view. I’ve enjoyed many a pint of Guinness in there, but I’m not a regular.
            My local, the Rising Sun, is actually much closer to the first bridge across the Tamar, upstream of the Plymouth Tamar bridge, and I’m a bit worried about getting in there tomorrow after fishing.

          2. They know their local customers who drink comme il faut. It’ll just be a question of spatial constraint indoors. A couple of cold pints outside if necessary.

      1. Absolutely Shyster Lawyers and they deserve to be struck off for their actions to keep known criminals in the country and only for their own pecuniary advantage. Where’s me Holland and Holland?

          1. With regard to these horrible, perverted little Muslims, it’s more like, “Where there’s a way, there’s a willy.”

  41. Good morning fellow insomniacs!
    Up & awake at 02:30 so decided to check my Premium Bonds and I’ve won another consolation prize, £25 worth.
    The DT got nothing.

    Plagiarised from Going Postal:-

    The shifting narrative…

    “No evidence…”

    “Unsubstantiated claims…”

    “Fraud has always happened…”

    “Not enough fraud to change the result…”

    “Look at those stupid ordinary people giving testimony. They are not acting like polished, professional & experienced speakers…”

    “Ok, there is evidence and it did change the result. Trump did win in a landslide, including California.. But-but-but ORANGE MAN BAD…”

  42. Oh bugger!
    Just checked my e-mails and found one from Student Son entitled Fire!:-

    There is a fire at flamsteed i am trying to phone on yha landline

    Spoke to him on the phone, he’s ok and no one is hurt, but one of the downstairs flats was badly damaged when the occupant accidently turned the cooker hotplate on and set a plastic box aflame!

    The Fire Brigade have left now and he sent me this pic of looking into the damaged flat:-
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e58fa3938587a1b74b7208cf623ecbcdbe347281fe643882d903b8ec5421b8ea.png

Comments are closed.